Menu

SIMGOT ET142 vs. KIWI EARS AETHER Comparison Review 

April 25, 2025 8 Min Read

Kiwi Ears introduced the Aether in the spring of 2025, a ~150 USD planar magnetic single-driver in-ear monitor. It’s the company’s first IEM of this type and features an unusually large 15.3mm driver.

The ET142 is a ~219 USD a dual driver in-ear monitor from Simgot. It utilizes a 12.5mm planar magnetic driver along with a piezoelectric tweeter. The ET142 launched in February 2025. 

SIMGOT ET142 SPECIFICATIONS

  • Drivers: 1 x 12.5mm planar magnetic driver + 1 x multi-layer piezoelectric ceramic driver 
  • Impedance: 14Ω ±15% (@1kHz)
  • Sensitivity: 118dB/Vrms (@1kHz)
  • Cable: 732-core mixed oxygen-free copper & silver-plated Litz
  • Connectors on earphones: 0.78mm 2-pin
  • Cable termination: Interchangeable 3.5mm single-ended & 4.4mm balanced

Current price and availability here.

KIWI EARS AETHER SPECIFICATIONS

  • Driver: 15.3 planar magnetic
  • Impedance: 14 Ohms
  • Sensitivity: 105 dB/mW
  • Frequency range: 20Hz-20kHz
  • Detachable cable: 1.2 m
  • Earphone connector type 0.78mm dual pin
  • Cable termination 3.5mm TRS jack

Current price and availability: 

BUILD AND COMFORT 

The ET142 is made entirely of metal, and it is quite heavy and bulky. It’s large, just barely not too much so for my ears and ear canals. I wouldn’t take them for a run, to put it that way. 

The Aether, on the other hand, is made of resin, and although the size is almost the same, it’s slightly smaller and much lighter. 

Once in place, I find both earphones to be quite comfortable, though I prefer the Aether. 

The cables are also very different, even more so actually. The ET142 has a very thick and stiff cable, the Aether a very thin and light one. My personal preference is that the cable is something in between the two extremes represented by these earphones. 

COMPARISONS 

Associated equipment: 

Sunrise by Norah Jones 

The Aether is very clear and well-balanced, with present vocals that have great texture. Although the Aether sounds large, the ET142 is even more expansive. It also sounds a bit more organic, but broadly speaking, they’re relatively similar.

Angel by Massive Attack

The ET142 has powerful bass and clear vocals. The Aether is similar, but less dynamic and articulate. It’s great, but feels less lively in direct comparison.

In The Mountains by Espen Eriksen Trio

The ET142 sounds large and organic. The Aether has slightly tighter bass and feels flatter and more neutral.

Limit to Your Love by James Blake 

The Aether is straightforward neutral and does nothing wrong. The bass is impeccable. The ET142 sounds brighter and bassier—it’s definitely less neutral, with a more V-shaped sound signature. The bass isn’t as defined and textured as with the Aether, even though it’s significantly stronger.

Bullet In The Head by Rage Against The Machine 

The Aether offers much better balance, with every instrument getting its designated space on the track. Vocals are not overshadowed by the bass, as is somewhat the case with the ET142.

The Tunnel by Tord Gustavsen Trio 

The Aether sounds good—neutral as always. The ET142 is brighter, but also more organic and airy, adding an extra dimension to the track that makes it more engaging than the neutral Aether.

Rocket Man by Bob James Trio 

The bass is massive with the ET142, yet the track still sounds great—very airy and organic. The Aether’s bass is significantly tighter, with non-recessed mids. Everything sounds well-balanced and neutral.

WRAPPING IT UP 

Sound Signature

The Aether is very neutral. It sounds flat, never doing anything outrageous. The ET142 has more color—the sound signature is clearly more V-shaped, with stronger bass and treble, which sometimes makes the midrange feel a bit recessed.

Treble

They both have resolved and clear treble, but the ET142 is brighter and more sparkly.

Midrange

Because of its V-shaped sound signature, the ET142 has a somewhat recessed midrange, which can be appealing at times and less so at others. The Aether is neutral and predictable. Both have excellent midrange detail and strong technical quality.

Bass

The ET142 has thicker and fuller-sounding bass. The Aether’s bass is pronounced and definitely not recessed, but it is always extremely well-defined with great texture.

Soundstage and Imaging 

The Aether has a good soundstage size with nice imaging. The ET142 sounds larger, though, with more precise imaging and a better sense of width, height, and depth.

Detail, Dynamics, and Timbre

They are both very detailed-sounding earphones. The ET142 sounds more detailed in the upper regions, while the Aether is definitely more detailed in the bass. The midrange is quite equal, but I’d rank the Aether half a point higher there if pushed.

Mostly, the ET142 feels more dynamic and alive, but there are many tracks where the neutral sound signature of the Aether makes things sound better.

In terms of timbre, the ET142 often sounds more organic, but the Aether never sounds wrong.

CONCLUSION

The Kiwi Ears Aether sounds very neutral and never puts a foot wrong. The ET142 is not neutral—it’s a colored earphone with a V-shaped signature. It can sound better or worse depending on the track. Often, it sounds more airy and organic, but other times, the flatter-sounding Aether simply gets the job done in a straightforward manner. If a recording needs extra colour and sparkle, the ET142 might be perfect. If the track is already well-balanced, the Aether is the better choice.

Thanks for reading. You can support us by purchasing anything using any of our affiliate links.

Any purchase you make on Amazon or Linsoul with any of our affiliate links will give us a small provision at no cost to you.

We only get a provision for items that are not returned, so there’s no incentive for us to recommend something that’s not good.

Linsoul : Headphones, Earbuds, Wireless Earbuds, Desktop DAC/AMP, Portable DAC/AMP, Digital Audio Players,

Amazon: Headphones, IEMs, Headphone Amplifiers, Home Audio or Anything else.

.

If you enjoyed this article or other content on The Headphoneer, you might consider leaving a small donation to keep this website up and running. No donation is too small. Thanks for supporting us!

If you like our work please follow us on Instagram, Facebook and Twitter , it will help us grow. Sharing is caring 🙂

Written By

Chris founded The Headphoneer in 2013 after spending years going down the rabbit hole of searching for the perfect high fidelity headphones. Having gained experience with lots of gear and spent way too much time discussing on online forums he wanted to write the reviews he rarely encountered: Thorough reviews with lots of comparisons. This was also a way of putting his growing collection of gear to use for the benefit of humanity.